Blog response instructions:
• Answer the questions in complete sentences and use proper English (restrain from using MSN chat style of writing).
• Use evidence from the novel to support your answer and include page numbers.
• When commenting to your peers, be respectful in your language and about their responses. It is okay to disagree, but do it in a polite manner.
Blog Question: After the Bully Lab was renamed, the Revealers, and the stories of the three Darkland students were released and well received by the student body, Elliot wanted to publish Russell’s narrative about Richie punching Russell in the face.
1) Why was Russell so opposed to the idea (pg. 110)? Explain. (4 pts)
Russell was opposed to the idea because he thought Richie changed a little and that Richie wasn't going to bully him anymore. Russell didn't want Richie to be mad at him because he didn't want to get punched by him again. Russell didn't want to be Richie's target. He just walked out of the spotlight. Russell didn't want to go back in again. In the story, Richie said that it was okay if Russell asked him questions. It just had to be the right questions. My opinion is that Russell thinks he gained some respect from Richie because of the whole incident with the Jock Rots when Richie protected him. This is shown on p. 97 - p. 99.
2) What is happening to the relationship between Russell and Richie. (3 pts)
I think the relationship between Russell and Richie is improving because Richie was kind of impressed that Russell stood up for himself and also because Richie doesn't bully Russell as much as he used to. In fact, Richie doesn't bully Russell at all nowadays. After the incident with the Jock Rots, Richie hasn't been mentioned in the story that much. Russell likes it that way and he doesn't want to go back to Square 1 with Richie.
3) Two Peer Comments (4 pts each)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Hey Ariba! That was great! :)
You put so nicely and explained a lot. You answered the questions brilliantly. Just remember to make sure the people who are reading this know what you are trying to say on the second question. But apart from that, it was great! Well done! :)
I strongly agree with your ansewers you did a good job but your second could be more clearer but overallit was great.
Dear Ariba,
I thought your answer for the first question is very descriptive.But on the second quesion you should mensoin page numbers and explain a bit more.
Hey! =)
I totally agree with you especially the part when for question 1. You did really good because you explained a lot and gave details.
Great job!
Hey Ariba
I like how you clearly explained your answers. They are very descriptive and i agree with all your points.
Remember to give evidence for both questions.
Great start!
keep the good work up.:)
Hey Ariba! I really liked your answers! I liked how you included evidence from the book and page numbers. It was interesting to read and very descriptive. Good job!
Hi Ariba!
You answered both questions really clearly and made it understandable. I agree strongly with your answers and it was good how you used page numbers, and evidence from the book; though you could have used page numbers on the second answer.
Post a Comment